Shopper Ignites Debate With Side-by-Side Shoe Comparison: ‘It’s Depressing’

A dismayed Redditor posted

photos

from one well-worn, decades-old boot pair and another broken-in, year-old boot pair to highlight the disparity in craftsmanship.

The boots in better condition were from the 1990s and bought at a thrift store, compared to the $170 boots that fell apart despite being new and supposedly coming from a “premium” brand, as mentioned by the original poster.

“They believe that high-quality products aren’t being manufactured nowadays, unlike how things were done in the past,” they noted.

The boots were merely three months old, but their soles were flaking off and they had large rips in them. They seemed beyond repair.

The planned obsolescence of

fast fashion

And even famous brand-name products are becoming a significant agent of devastation for our planet.


Project Cece

indicates that “planned obsolescence,” with regard to consumer goods, involves creating, producing, and promoting items such that they are disposed of shortly after their release.

As stated by Project Cece, individuals typically use new pieces of attire just seven times on average.

Due to the poor quality of numerous products, such as the boots mentioned in this Reddit post, they frequently end up being discarded shortly after purchase.


Pebble Mag reported

that this negligent sector led to 18.6 million tons of apparel waste in 2020, with numbers expected to climb further unless individuals begin taking action.

rejecting quick fashion trends

.

And this refuse doesn’t just go to landfills; it also ends up in natural environments, such as washing ashore.

shorelines

and flooding into

rivers

around the world.


Which of these factors would most effectively motivate you to recycle old clothes and electronics?



Giving me money back



Allowing me to exchange for new items



Simplifying it as much as we can



Preventing my items from ending up in landfills


Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.

A fantastic method to prevent ending up in the

fast fashion

the temptation is to purchase additional clothing items and accessories.

thrift stores

, where more robust items can be found at affordable prices, allowing shoppers to save money while steering clear of fast fashion.

Users on Reddit showed empathy towards the poster.


One mentioned

A film exploring the contrast between product manufacturing techniques from the 1970s and ’80s versus current methods, highlighting the decline in overall quality nowadays.

“The primary cause was profitability and the capacity for rapid fashion turnover… it’s disheartening,” the commenter clarified.


Another wrote

When the entire economic system focuses on extracting maximum profits from every available source, planned obsolescence and poor quality become unavoidable to encourage more consumption.

Join our

free newsletter

for

good news

and

useful tips

, and don’t miss

this cool list

Here are some simple methods to assist both yourself and the Earth.


Customer ignites controversy with juxtaposed image of two shoe pairs: ‘This is disheartening’

first appeared on

The Cool Down

.